CEFactSheetJHC_2026
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CEFactSheetJHC_2026
- Posted
- Apr 1, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 1, 2026 – Jul 24, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Public hearing requirement |
|---|
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 23, 2026Comment submitted by Emily BakerOpposeIndividual
A concerned citizen and utility customer opposes the permit for waste injection wells, citing risks to the local watershed and the Great Lakes. The commenter also requests a deadline extension and advocates for the closure of the Campbell Coal Plant and the cleaning of its ash pits.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Comment submitted by M A EinhausOpposeIndividual
An individual commenter opposes the proposed action, expressing concern that coal waste storage and injection wells near Lake Michigan pose a significant threat to groundwater and the Great Lakes. They argue that the EPA should enact the strongest possible safety standards and urge Consumers Energy to challenge orders keeping the Campbell coal plant open.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Comment submitted by Nan O'NeillOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 20, 2026Comment submitted by Cynthia Veldheer DeYoungOpposeIndividual
An individual property owner expresses opposition to the proposed injection well permit, arguing that it lacks sufficient protocols to protect groundwater. The commenter requests more rigorous regulations, monitoring, and public disclosure regarding the diminishing aquifer.
Read comment → - Jul 19, 2026Comment submitted by Autumn BellOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 18, 2026Comment submitted by Daniel ZimmerOtherIndividual
The commenter is seeking clarification and transparency regarding the specific discharge locations and chemical compositions of "cooling water" from a coal-fired plant. They are requesting a flow chart and an itemized definition of cooling water to be provided at a public hearing.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Comment submitted by Daniel ZimmerOpposeIndividual
Dan Zimmer, a resident of West Olive, Michigan, opposes the proposed action by highlighting the risks of deep well injection and the resulting groundwater scarcity. He argues that the current practices of disposing of oil and gas waste water are depleting aquifers and removing water from the natural cycle.
Read comment → - Jul 11, 2026Comment submitted by Daniel ZimmerOtherIndividual
The commenter is requesting specific technical data regarding disposal volumes, durations, and land surface acreage related to the JHC facility's coal combustion residual (CCR) management. They intend to attend a future availability session to obtain these specific answers.
Read comment → - Jul 11, 2026Comment submitted by Daniel ZimmerOtherIndividual
The commenter is asking technical questions regarding the safety and monitoring of buried pipelines used to convey leachate to wellheads. They suggest specific methods, such as using isolation valves and pressure tests, to detect potential leaks.
Read comment → - Jul 1, 2026Comment submitted by Jason KalisOpposeIndividualRead comment →
