CEFactSheetJHC_2026
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CEFactSheetJHC_2026
- Posted
- Apr 1, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 1, 2026 – Jul 24, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Public hearing requirement |
|---|
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 18, 2026Comment submitted by Daniel ZimmerOtherIndividual
The commenter is seeking clarification and transparency regarding the specific discharge locations and chemical compositions of "cooling water" from a coal-fired plant. They are requesting a flow chart and an itemized definition of cooling water to be provided at a public hearing.
Read comment → - Apr 28, 2026Comment submitted by Kathy KingsleySupportIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 27, 2026Comment submitted by Diane WaltersOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 16, 2026Comment submitted by Lisa ShippOpposeIndividual
A private individual is expressing strong opposition to the proposed activity of injecting coal waste into or near Lake Michigan. They argue that the Great Lakes must be protected from any risk of contamination due to their importance as a freshwater source.
Read comment → - Apr 16, 2026Comment submitted by Doris DavisOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 15, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividual
A community member near Lake Michigan opposes the proposal to dump waste from a nearby coal plant into the lake. They argue that the action is environmentally and ethically negligent and request that the public be allowed to vote on the matter.
Read comment → - Apr 11, 2026Anonymous public commentOpposeIndividualRead comment →
