Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Consumer protections | Price transparency |
|---|---|---|
Southwest Airlines Co. BusinessSupport Southwest Airlines is requesting a 21-day extension of the comment period for the NPRM on Enhancing Flexibility of Air F |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 104 comments from the past week
104 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 22, 2026Southwest Airlines Co.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Southwest Airlines is requesting a 21-day extension of the comment period for the NPRM on Enhancing Flexibility of Air Fare Price Advertising. While they support the proposed deregulatory action regarding tax and fee display, they argue that more time is needed to address their opposition to the rescission of guidance documents and the repeal of the Full Fare Advertising Rule.
Read comment → - Jul 7, 2026Loyal TravelSupportIndividual
The commenter advocates for stricter regulations on online airline ticketing companies to ensure transparent pricing and fair competition. They specifically call for clear display of total costs, an end to misleading "limited seats" claims, and restrictions on unauthorized promotional pricing.
Read comment → - Jul 29, 2026Lynn SwansonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed regulatory change because they believe it would allow airlines to hide the total price of tickets behind "mysterious fees and taxes." They argue that the DOT should maintain the full-fair rule to ensure transparency for consumers.
Read comment → - Jul 29, 2026Gregg BenderOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026Polly RobinsonOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026Carla MixonOpposeIndividual
A senior citizen expresses opposition to the proposed action, arguing that it would increase confusion for consumers when booking airline tickets. The commenter specifically argues against removing the requirement to list fares that include taxes and other fees.
Read comment → - Jul 29, 2026John GarlischOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026John GarlischSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 29, 2026Charles HawkinsOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports aligning DOT rules with FTC and IRS regulations to ensure total airline fares, including all mandatory fees and taxes, are presented most prominently in advertisements. They also advocate for clearer definitions of terms like "mandatory charge" and "free ticket," and suggest a nine-month transition period for industry compliance.
Read comment →
