Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates: Visa and Citizenship Services Fee Changes
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Schedule of Fees for Consular Services, Department of State and Overseas Embassies and Consulates: Visa and Citizenship Services Fee Changes
- Posted
- Jun 9, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 9, 2026 – Jul 10, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11513
- CFR
- 22 CFR Part 22
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Visa fee requirements | Expedited visa processing |
|---|---|---|
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Trade associationOppose The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) opposes the proposed $750 nonimmigrant visa appointment expedite fee | · | |
GREAT USA Trade associationSupport The GREAT USA Coalition, representing over 30 member organizations in the travel and hospitality industries, supports th | ||
Vanteo BusinessSupport Vanteo, a talent solutions firm, supports the Department of State's pilot program allowing B1/B2 visa applicants to pay |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 6, 2026Assisting Hands Home CareSupportBusinessRead comment →
- Jul 3, 2026Assisting Hands Home CareSupportBusinessRead comment →
- Jun 29, 2026BotBlox IncSupportBusinessRead comment →
- Jul 9, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 6, 2026Calvin MazlumyanSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed fee changes and urges the Department of State to extend expedited interview options to E-1 and E-2 treaty investors. They argue that these investors create jobs and commit capital, and therefore should have the same priority as tourists who pay for expedited service.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026Rick MaineSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that the Department of State should allow E-2 visa applicants to pay a fee to expedite their interviews, similar to the process for tourists. They believe this would encourage more investment in the United States and job creation by providing more predictable processing times.
Read comment → - Jul 6, 2026Matthew MyersSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 2, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
An E-2 visa investor supports the proposal to establish an optional expedited processing service for E visas. The commenter argues that current delays cause significant financial hardship for small businesses and that an expedited option would help investors launch businesses sooner, creating jobs and economic growth.
Read comment → - Jun 30, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportBusinessRead comment →
- Jun 29, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportBusinessRead comment →
