The commenter opposes the proposed CMAA billing codes that would allow hospitals to bill for clinical work performed entirely by AI. They argue that these codes create a financial incentive to prioritize algorithms over human clinicians, which they believe will erode patient outcomes.

The commenter opposes the creation of a specific billing code for AI in hospitals, arguing that it would lead to the replacement of human medical staff with technology. They express concern that AI lacks the nuanced judgment of human providers and that prioritizing cost-saving over human care will negatively impact patient outcomes.

Samantha E Hess, a concerned citizen, opposes the creation of billing codes for AI in healthcare. She argues that prioritizing AI over skilled nurses will exacerbate the nursing shortage, devalue human empathy in medicine, and harm the patient-provider connection.

Alyssa Tozzi, a registered nurse, opposes the authorization of billing codes for AI in healthcare. She argues that prioritizing AI over nursing costs will negatively impact patient outcomes and lead to job losses for nurses.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that monetizing and legislating AI in healthcare will deprioritize human medical professionals, lead to worse patient outcomes, and create significant liability issues. They advocate for maintaining the "human touch" and real-person training in medical care.

The commenter opposes the creation of reimbursable billing codes for AI, arguing that AI is a tool to support human providers rather than a replacement for them. They express concern that providing billing codes for AI could prioritize profit over patient outcomes and suggest that human providers should receive billing codes first.