A nurse practitioner opposes the proposal to allow hospitals to bill for AI-assisted services, arguing it will lead to unnecessary use of technology, legal complications, and increased healthcare inequity. The commenter emphasizes that healthcare is a human practice and expresses concern over the costs and data safety implications for patients.

The commenter opposes the creation of a specific billing code for AI in hospitals, arguing that it would lead to the replacement of human medical staff with technology. They express concern that AI lacks the nuanced judgment of human providers and that prioritizing cost-saving over human care will negatively impact patient outcomes.

The commenter opposes the implementation of WISeR tests and the use of AI in medical decision-making. They argue for patient choice in doctors, the preservation of non-HMO Medicare plans, and a fee-for-service payment model.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that monetizing and legislating AI in healthcare will deprioritize human medical professionals, lead to worse patient outcomes, and create significant liability issues. They advocate for maintaining the "human touch" and real-person training in medical care.

Nancy Bell, a private individual, opposes the creation of AI billing codes. She argues that AI transcription can be inaccurate and dangerous for patient care, and that new billing codes would prioritize profit over the use of human medical professionals.