Interstate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act Firearms

The commenter supports the proposed amendments to 27 CFR 478.28, arguing that the current requirement for individual approval for short-term interstate travel with NFA firearms creates unnecessary administrative burdens. They advocate for the categorical authorization for travel under 365 days and request further clarification on pass-through protections for travelers.

The General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church opposes the proposed rule because it removes the pre-travel approval requirement for certain firearms. They argue that public safety should be prioritized over convenience and that the rule puts communities at risk of gun violence.

The National Firearms Act Trade and Collectors Association (NFATCA) supports the proposed rule to extend the duration of approved travel authorizations for NFA firearms. They argue that the current requirements impose unnecessary administrative burdens and suggest that the Department should eventually consider eliminating the notification requirement for temporary interstate transportation entirely.

The commenter, an individual, strongly opposes the proposed action, arguing that it would make it easier for the USPS to deliver firearms and for individuals to transport assault weapons across state lines. They express concern that these policies prioritize the gun industry over public safety and contribute to gun violence.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices compromises public safety. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary to prevent these weapons from being moved into prohibited areas.