Comment on FR Doc # 2026-09161

I strongly support the proposed amendments to 27 CFR 478.28. Any reasonable change that lessens the burden of lawful travel with NFA firearms is welcome. The current requirement to submit ATF Form 5320.20 and wait for individual approval before short-term interstate travel imposes unnecessary delay and uncertainty on lawful owners. It can interfere with trips to shooting ranges, competitions, training events, hunting destinations, temporary residences, and other lawful activities. A paperwork error or administrative delay should not prevent someone from traveling with a firearm that is already lawfully registered to that individual. The proposed categorical authorization for interstate transportation lasting 365 days or fewer is a substantial improvement. I also support allowing long-term and permanent moves to proceed after the required notice period without forcing the registrant to wait indefinitely for an individual approval. I particularly support the proposed pass-through protection for individuals traveling through jurisdictions that prohibit the firearm, provided the firearm is transported in compliance with 18 U.S.C. 926A. Lawful travelers should not risk arrest, prosecution, or the loss of their firearms merely because a practical travel route crosses an anti-gun jurisdiction. This clarification provides greater certainty and recognizes the realities of interstate travel. In the final rule and any accompanying guidance, ATF should make clear that ordinary and reasonably necessary travel interruptions—such as stops for fuel, food, rest, vehicle repairs, medical needs, overnight lodging, or transportation connections—do not automatically eliminate pass-through protection. Without that clarity, lawful travelers may remain exposed to unnecessary legal risk despite complying with the purpose of the rule. ATF’s own figures demonstrate why reform is justified. Only a very small percentage of applications were denied because the firearm was prohibited at the destination, while technical errors were the most common reason for denial. The existing approval process therefore creates substantial burdens while providing little corresponding public-safety benefit. The proposed rule respects lawful NFA ownership, reduces unnecessary paperwork, and gives travelers greater flexibility and certainty. ATF should finalize it without narrowing its short-term transportation or pass-through provisions.