Clarification of Discretionary Employment Authorization for Certain Aliens

The commenter, a humanitarian parolee from Ukraine, opposes the proposed rule because it adds unnecessary barriers and delays to the employment authorization process for lawful parolees. They argue that the additional requirements for proof of economic necessity and E-Verify restrictions will harm their ability to support their family and maintain employment.

An individual who arrived from Ukraine under the Uniting for Ukraine program opposes the proposed restrictions on discretionary employment authorization for humanitarian parolees. The commenter argues that the proposal would create unnecessary delays and administrative burdens for families who need to work to remain financially independent and avoid public assistance.

An individual from Ukraine requesting that the government extend employment authorization documents (EADs) for their family. The commenter argues that an extension is necessary for them to remain employed and continue paying taxes.

The commenter, a private individual sponsoring a Ukrainian family with TPS, argues that the government's slow processing of work authorization cards is causing severe financial hardship for the family. They urge the government to streamline the bureaucracy and process the forms in a timely manner.

A Ukrainian immigrant under the U4U program expresses personal hardship due to a delay in receiving work authorization. The commenter argues against the restrictions on work permits, stating that the inability to work prevents them from meeting basic needs and pursuing education.

The commenter, a recipient of the Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) program, opposes the proposed rule because it could lead to additional restrictions or delays in employment authorization for humanitarian parole recipients. They argue that lengthy processing times for re-parole applications cause significant financial and emotional hardship for families who are already contributing to the U.S. economy.

An individual is opposing the proposed rule, arguing that it creates unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles and burdens for Ukrainian nationals seeking to renew their work authorizations. The commenter emphasizes that these individuals are productive, tax-paying members of society and that the proposed changes would waste taxpayer dollars.

A Ukrainian humanitarian parolee living in the United States supports the action, emphasizing the need for timely and predictable employment authorization. The commenter argues that administrative delays create significant financial hardship for families and employers alike, and urges USCIS to ensure a transparent system that allows for continuous work authorization.