Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Occupant Crash Protection
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Occupant Crash Protection
- Posted
- Jun 29, 2010
- Comment period
- Jun 29, 2010 – Aug 31, 2010
- FR Doc
- 2010-15773
- CFR
- 49 CFR Part 571
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Child passenger safety | Seat belt reminders | Child left in vehicle |
|---|---|---|---|
Alliance of Automobile Manufactures BusinessOppose The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, representing several major car manufacturers, opposes the proposed mandate for | · | · | |
Consumers Union AdvocacySupport Consumers Union supports the petition to require seat belt reminder systems (SBRSs) for rear seating positions in light | · | ||
DEVCO Design & Development BusinessSupport David DeVeau of DEVCO Design & Development supports the proposed rules regarding seat belt warnings and provides specifi | · | · | |
General Motors LLC BusinessOther General Motors LLC provides feedback on the proposal to require rear seat belt reminder systems (SRBS), expressing conce | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Oct 21, 2010Alliance of Automobile ManufacturesOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, representing several major car manufacturers, opposes the proposed mandate for rear seat belt reminder systems (SBRS). They argue that the technology is currently premature due to significant engineering complexities, lack of evidence regarding effectiveness, and potential reliability issues with removable seats and child restraint systems.
Read comment → - Aug 31, 2010CD Invenio Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Donald McCracken of Invenio Inc. argues that while automated sensing systems for preventing children from being left in vehicles are complex and potentially unreliable, user-activated reminder devices with vehicle prompting are a more effective and cost-efficient solution. He supports the implementation of such devices to address both vehicular hyperthermia and the high societal costs of vehicle break-ins.
Read comment → - Aug 30, 2010Consumers UnionSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Consumers Union supports the petition to require seat belt reminder systems (SBRSs) for rear seating positions in light passenger vehicles. They argue that these systems should include both visual and audible warnings, as well as occupant detection technology, to effectively increase seat belt usage and improve safety.
Read comment → - Aug 30, 2010Tanya AshtonSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed safety standards and argues that they should be expanded to require seat belt reminders in all seating positions. They also advocate for the inclusion of alerts to notify drivers if a child has been left alone in the backseat.
Read comment → - Aug 30, 2010Mary ParksSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the implementation of seat belt reminders in all seating positions to ensure children are properly buckled and to alert drivers if a child is left in the vehicle. They argue that these systems would provide a necessary safety net for distracted parents and help prevent tragedies like heatstroke or accidental abandonment.
Read comment → - Aug 30, 2010Roger ConardSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 30, 2010Bonnie KozialSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) supports the petition to require automobile manufacturers to install seat belt reminder systems for rear vehicle seats. They also suggest that these systems should be compatible with LATCH systems and potentially adapted to alert drivers if a child is left behind in a vehicle.
Read comment → - Aug 3, 2010Jennifer PulikkanSupportIndividualRead comment →
