Citizen Petition from Consumers for Dental Choice, et al.
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Consumers for Dental Choice, et al.
- Posted
- Apr 23, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 23, 2026 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ban dental amalgam | Consumer deception and monopoly | Health and mental health impacts |
|---|---|---|---|
Consumers for Dental Choice AdvocacySupport The commenter, representing Consumers for Dental Choice, strongly supports a federal ban on mercury amalgam dental filli |
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 6, 2026Comment from J. LeslieSupportIndividual
The commenter, a private individual from New Jersey, expresses personal concerns regarding the health risks of mercury in dental fillings. They argue that mercury exposure contributes to toxic burdens on the body and may be linked to neurological issues like dementia.
Read comment → - Jun 30, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed action to ban mercury in dental work, citing concerns that mercury exposure during pregnancy causes cleft palates and other developmental issues in children.
Read comment → - Jun 20, 2026Comment from Holdread JoyceSupportIndividual
Joyce Holdread, a private individual, supports the proposed ban on mercury in dental amalgams. She argues that mercury is a neurotoxin and expresses concern that its use in dentistry is outdated compared to other countries.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026Comment from Alwais JoySupportIndividual
The commenter supports the ban on mercury amalgams in dentistry, citing personal health issues they attribute to mercury exposure and neurotoxicity. They argue that the government should prioritize public safety over pharmaceutical interests by banning the use of mercury in medical and dental practices.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter expresses strong opposition to the use of mercury in dental treatments and vaccines, citing health concerns. They advocate for the removal of mercury from human consumption due to its perceived toxicity.
Read comment → - May 28, 2026Comment from Backman Allan E.SupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Al Backman provides a detailed personal account of his physical health improvements following the removal of dental amalgams and a subsequent detox process. He argues that his previous symptoms—including neurological issues, joint pain, and skin conditions—were caused by mercury toxicity from dental work and other sources like vaccines.
Read comment → - May 16, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter expresses extreme hostility toward the FDA, accusing the agency of knowingly using mercury and other toxins in vaccines and dental products. By demanding that FDA employees undergo mercury-based dental procedures, the commenter is advocating for the continued use of mercury-based amalgams as a way to "prove" the agency's claims of safety.
Read comment → - May 13, 2026Comment from Jane HoffmanSupportIndividualRead comment →
