Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
- Posted
- Mar 26, 2013
- Comment period
- Mar 26, 2013 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Apr 27, 2025Comment from JML ADVOCATESSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition by demanding stricter safeguards and regulations on radiation in food and water, specifically regarding seafood from Fukushima. They argue that nuclear power is harmful and advocate for a transition to green renewable energy.
Read comment → - Feb 26, 2016Comment from Harriet SheeleySupportIndividual
An individual is requesting that the agency reduce radiation limits for food, supplements, and pharmaceuticals to 5 bq per kilogram. They argue that lower permissible levels would increase public trust in the food supply and emphasize the need for careful radiation monitoring.
Read comment → - Jun 23, 2014Comment from Greg BanksSupportAdvocacyRead comment →
- Sep 3, 2013MaryKelly Sutton MD - CommentSupportIndividual
A physician expresses concern over the health threats posed by the Fukushima Daichi incident and supports the proposed action to prioritize the measurement and publication of radiation levels.
Read comment → - Jul 7, 2013David Hiebert Klassen - CommentSupportIndividual
The commenter, identifying as a scientist, supports the petition by advocating for the collection and examination of radiation data related to the Fukushima disaster. They express concern over the ongoing threat posed by the spent fuel rods and emphasize the government's responsibility to monitor radiation effects.
Read comment →
