Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) - Citizen Petition
- Posted
- Mar 26, 2013
- Comment period
- Mar 26, 2013 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Apr 8, 2026Comment from Mark GieseSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 26, 2025Comment from ERNEST FULLERSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 25, 2025Comment from Jeffrey AkardSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 17, 2025Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to lower the FDA's admissible levels of cesium-134 and cesium-137 in food. They argue that current levels are unsafe due to bioaccumulation and the increasing risk of radioactive contamination from Japanese exports and nuclear expansion.
Read comment → - Mar 13, 2025Comment from Bill SmirnowSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed action to lower acceptable radiation levels in the US food supply, arguing that current limits are far too high and pose a significant health risk to the public. They advocate for a policy that aligns more closely with Japanese standards to protect against cellular mutagenosis.
Read comment → - Mar 11, 2025Comment from Klaus PresslerOpposeIndividual📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Mar 11, 2025Comment from P GalbavySupportAdvocacy
The Fukushima Fallout Awareness Network (Citizens for Health) argues that the current permissible levels of radioactive cesium in food should be revised more rapidly to protect public health. They advocate for more stringent controls and a comprehensive reevaluation of guidelines based on the latest scientific evidence regarding long-term health risks.
Read comment → - Mar 10, 2025Comment from B. ChanSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 10, 2025Comment from Mario ZdybelSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jun 18, 2024Comment from Bill SmirnowSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed action to reduce radiation limits in food, arguing that the FDA is currently prioritizing the nuclear industry over public health. They cite concerns regarding regulatory capture and provide a link to a statement by an expert on the health effects of ionizing radiation.
Read comment →
