Matthew T. Keefe - Exemption/Rulemaking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Matthew T. Keefe - Exemption/Rulemaking
- Posted
- Apr 7, 2025
- Comment period
- Apr 7, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 7, 2026Robert LacySupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe, an Air Force Combat Systems Officer, supports extending the ability to log flight time toward ATP certificate requirements to certain CSOs and NFOs who perform duties similar to flight engineers. He argues that for specific CSO roles involving intensive flight deck duties, the experience gained is highly relevant to airline piloting and suggests allowing these individuals to log 1/3 time up to 500 hours.
Read comment → - Sep 4, 2025James CorringtonSupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe, a former Naval Flight Officer and current instructor pilot, supports counting Naval Flight Officer (NFO) time toward ATP flight hours. He argues that NFOs possess superior situational awareness and risk-mitigation skills that enhance aviation safety and operational proficiency.
Read comment → - Jul 14, 2025Bryon YamajiSupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe supports the proposed rulemaking to allow NFO/WSO aircrew to count their flight experience toward certain ratings. He argues that their experience in tactical aircraft is comparable to civilian co-pilots and more extensive than that of flight engineers.
Read comment → - Jul 11, 2025Clayton CouchSupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe, a former F-15E weapon systems officer and flight evaluator, supports the rule change. He argues that the change will expand the US flying talent pool by recognizing the qualifications of experienced aviators who already possess the necessary knowledge for flight procedures.
Read comment → - Jul 8, 2025Scott FisherSupportIndividual
The commenter, a pilot with significant military flight experience, supports the rule change to allow military flight hours to count toward civilian flying careers. They argue that the rule is a necessary step to address the long-standing pilot shortage.
Read comment → - Jun 9, 2025Clinton KelleySupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe, a former military flight officer, proposes that Weapon Systems Officers (WSOs) and Navigators (NFOs) should be allowed to count their military flight time toward R-ATP eligibility. He argues that their experience in 2-place cockpits is equivalent to civilian second-in-command roles and that the current requirement to hold a commercial rating before qualifying special crew time is an unnecessary barrier for transitioning veterans.
Read comment → - May 19, 2025John BussardSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 17, 2025Alec TherreSupportIndividual
Matthew T. Keefe, a former military flight instructor and FAA Comm Cert holder, argues that his extensive experience as an instructor and second-in-command should provide him with the same type of credit given to Flight Examiners (FEs). He supports the rulemaking by advocating for the recognition of his specific flight training and instructional background.
Read comment → - May 13, 2025Harry DaviesSupportIndividual
A Naval Aviator supports the rulemaking to allow Naval Flight Officers to count a portion of their flight time (Special Crew Time) toward FAA certificates. The commenter argues that the training and responsibilities of these officers are comparable to those of pilots and flight engineers.
Read comment → - May 9, 2025Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
