Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Trid rule impact | Regulatory burden on small lenders | Appraisal fee transparency |
|---|---|---|---|
Fairway Consumer Discount Company BusinessSupport Mark Warshal of Fairway Consumer Discount Company, a small mortgage lender, argues that cumulative regulatory requiremen | · | · | |
Ohnward Bancshares, Inc. BusinessSupport Brian Holst, representing Ohnward Bancshares, Inc. | · | · | |
Oostburg State Bank BusinessSupport Kristen S. | · | · | |
RiverStone Lending LLC BusinessSupport A licensed mortgage broker supports the Bureau's request for information on reducing compliance friction and expanding c | · | · |
3 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 13, 2026Wayne JohnstonSupportOther
The commenter argues that the current "0% tolerance fee rule" and disclosure requirements allow Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) to suppress appraiser fees and deceive consumers. They advocate for reworking these rules to allow for a free market where appraiser fees are transparently separated from AMC fees and reflect the actual complexity of the work.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Tisha Stanovic-KeesySupportIndividual
The commenter, likely an appraiser or representative of the appraisal profession, argues that the current "0% tolerance" fee rule and disclosure requirements are deceptive to consumers and harmful to appraisers. They advocate for reworking these rules to allow for a fluid fee structure that clearly separates the appraiser's compensation from the Appraisal Management Company's (AMC) fees.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Peg PETERSONSupportIndividual
Peg Peterson, a certified appraiser with 43 years of experience, supports the proposed action to prevent Appraisal Management Companies (AMCs) from bundling their fees with those paid to appraisers. She argues that this practice allows AMCs to reduce appraiser pay without proper disclosure.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeOther
The commenter argues that the combined fee disclosure and the 0% tolerance for appraisal fees should be repealed. They claim these measures allow lenders and AMCs to suppress appraiser compensation and ignore property complexity, which hinders the training of new appraisers.
Read comment →
