Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 27, 2026Cassie HillianOtherOtherRead comment →
- Jul 26, 2026Terry EwellOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed commercial leasing for outer continental shelf minerals off the coast of Virginia. They argue that such activities would jeopardize the fragile natural environment, wildlife, and marine life of the Eastern Shore.
Read comment → - Jul 26, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual is expressing strong opposition to proposed seabed mining on Virginia's outer continental shelf. They argue that the mining would devastate marine ecosystems, threaten the seafood industry, and harm the local economy, citing a global call for a moratorium.
Read comment → - Jul 26, 2026Anton TyreeOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed project, arguing that it will cause long-term negative impacts on marine life and the ocean floor. They advocate for marine and ecological studies to be conducted before proceeding with the project.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Marilyn AilesOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed dredging action, arguing that it would damage the local tourism industry, harm the aquaculture sector by coating shellfish in debris and chemicals, and destroy critical wildlife habitats. They emphasize the importance of preserving the coastline's natural state for the livelihoods of local residents and the protection of economically important species.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Nicole ChiappaOpposeAcademic
An environmental scientist and marine biologist opposes the proposed mining action, citing potential damage to marine ecosystems, loss of biodiversity, and negative impacts on ecotourism. The commenter argues that the environmental costs and "trophic cascades" outweigh the potential economic gains.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A resident and recreational fisherman opposes the proposed seabed mining leases off the Virginia coast. The commenter argues that mining will damage marine ecosystems, threaten commercial fisheries, risk the release of toxic contaminants, and exacerbate coastal erosion.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's proposal to lease offshore Virginia seabed for mineral mining. The commenter argues that seabed mining would destroy habitats and harm endangered marine species like the Atlantic sturgeon and North Atlantic right whale.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Dan RichardsonOpposeIndividual
A local resident, fisherman, and biologist opposes the offshore mining proposal due to concerns about environmental damage to the Eastern Shore's fragile ecosystem. The commenter argues that mining will disrupt marine life and marshes, undermining decades of conservation efforts for the benefit of profit-driven entities.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Dawn HarnishOpposeIndividualRead comment →
