Request for Information and Interest: Commercial Leasing for Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Offshore the Commonwealth of Virginia
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Request for Information and Interest: Commercial Leasing for Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Offshore the Commonwealth of Virginia
- Posted
- Jun 23, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 23, 2026 – Aug 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12600
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Offshore mining impacts | Deep sea mining environmental impact | Fisheries and economic impact | Environmental protection | Public engagement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission (A-NPDC) GovernmentOppose The Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission (A-NPDC) opposes seabed mineral exploration and mining due to pote | · | · | |||
Carolina Ocean Alliance AdvocacyOppose The Carolina Ocean Alliance, along with several other environmental and coastal organizations, opposes the proposed leas | · | · | · | ||
Clean Ocean Action AdvocacyOppose Clean Ocean Action, an environmental advocacy organization, opposes the proposed leasing program for offshore mineral ex | · | · | |||
Fisheries Survival Fund AdvocacyOppose The Fisheries Survival Fund, represented by legal counsel, opposes the proposed mineral mining lease area offshore Virgi | · | · | |||
National Ocean Industries Association Trade associationSupport The National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) supports the federal action to pursue commercial leasing for offshore m | · | · | · | · | · |
New England Fishermen's Stewardship Association AdvocacyOppose The New England Fisherman's Stewardship Association (NEFSA) opposes the proposed mineral mining lease areas offshore Vir | · | · | |||
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. BusinessSupport Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. | · | · | |||
Plus Nature LLC AdvocacyOppose +Nature argues that the proposed Virginia offshore mineral leasing should not proceed until a framework of "Principles f | · | · | · | · | · |
Shellfish Growers of Virginia Trade associationOppose The Shellfish Growers of Virginia, a trade association representing the state's shellfish aquaculture industry, opposes | · | · | |||
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (SCCCL) AdvocacyOppose The South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (CCL) opposes the proposed commercial mineral leasing offshore Virginia, | · | · | · | ||
The Nature Conservancy AdvocacyOppose The Nature Conservancy expresses significant concerns regarding the potential for mineral extraction off the coast of Vi | · | · | |||
Virginia Maritime Association Trade associationSupport The Virginia Maritime Association (VMA), representing nearly 400 port-related businesses, supports the responsible devel | · | · | · | · | |
Virginia Spaceport Authority GovernmentOppose The Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority (VSA) opposes the proposed commercial leasing of hard mineral resources o | · | · | · | · | |
Wetstone US Ventures, Inc. BusinessSupport Wetstone US Ventures, Inc. | · | · | · | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 24 comments from the past week
24 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 24, 2026Defend Our Beaches NJOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026SeaStead AI www.SeaSteadAI.comSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Doug Scott of SeaStead AI submits a comment urging the BOEM to include benthic PFAS re-mobilization as a mandatory review criterion in the environmental impact assessments for offshore mineral leasing. The commenter argues that commercial extraction could disturb legacy toxins in ocean sediments, threatening marine ecosystems and coastal shorelines.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Cashman Dredging & Marine ContractingSupportBusiness
Cashman Dredging & Marine Contracting Co., LLC (CDMC) supports the BOEM's evaluation of offshore mineral development in Virginia. They argue that the industry has the technical expertise to conduct responsible dredging and that domestic mineral recovery can enhance national security and economic resilience.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Seasider Charters LLCOpposeBusiness
Captain Tom Burkett, owner of Seasider Charters LLC, opposes the proposed commercial mineral leasing offshore Virginia. He argues that mineral extraction would destroy marine habitats, harm fisheries, and negatively impact his ecotourism business which relies on a pristine coastal environment.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026McQuilling RenewablesSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
McQuilling Renewables supports the BOEM planning process and suggests conducting a maritime traffic assessment to identify potential conflicts between offshore mining and commercial/recreational marine uses. The company offers its expertise in marine supply chain solutions and previous experience conducting similar assessments for other offshore energy projects.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026National Ocean Industries AssociationSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) supports the federal action to pursue commercial leasing for offshore minerals in Virginia. They argue that domestic mineral exploration is vital for national security, economic prosperity, and reducing dependence on foreign adversaries like China.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Clean Ocean ActionOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Clean Ocean Action, an environmental advocacy organization, opposes the proposed leasing program for offshore mineral extraction off the coast of Virginia. They argue that mining would cause significant environmental harm to endangered species and habitats, conflict with existing maritime industries, and that less damaging alternatives for mineral sourcing exist.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Fugro USA, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Fugro USA, Inc. supports the proposed action and recommends that BOEM conduct a comprehensive inventory of existing datasets and perform targeted seafloor and subsurface mapping to fill data gaps. They argue that high-resolution mapping is essential for de-risking exploration, ensuring environmentally responsible development, and maximizing lease revenues for the U.S. Treasury.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Responsible Offshore Science AllianceOtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Responsible Offshore Science Alliance (ROSA) submits comments providing guidance on how to conduct scientifically robust monitoring and fisheries coordination for potential mineral leasing. They do not take a position on whether the leasing should proceed but emphasize using existing offshore wind research and engaging directly with the fishing industry.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Wetstone US Ventures, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Wetstone US Ventures, Inc. supports the proposed commercial leasing for OCS minerals offshore Virginia and advocates for offering a full range of minerals in broad lease areas. They recommend specific lease structures, including graduated royalty rates, a 20-year primary term with production-based continuation, and clear regulatory timelines to encourage investment.
Read comment →
