Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 25, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed rule allowing federal employees to take administrative leave for physical fitness. They argue that this will improve work-life balance, mental well-being, and employee motivation while reducing burnout.
Read comment → - Jul 14, 2026Comment from Kathy CovielloSupportOther
The commenter argues in favor of allowing civilian employees to use duty hours for physical fitness, citing benefits such as increased readiness, improved productivity, better work-life balance, and reduced sick leave. They advocate for keeping this as a permanent option for OPM Administrative Leave, noting that it fosters long-term wellness and provides a significant return on investment.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter advocates for a policy allowing employees to use a limited portion of duty time for physical fitness and wellness activities. They argue that this practice is common across other federal agencies and would improve employee health, morale, and organizational readiness.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 1, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter proposes that federal employees be granted three hours of administrative leave per week for physical fitness and wellness activities. They argue that a healthier workforce leads to lower healthcare costs, increased productivity, and improved employee engagement and mental health.
Read comment →
