Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 30, 2026Comment from Marcy MarcusSupportIndividual
The commenter proposes that employees relocating to distant facilities be granted administrative leave to manage their personal transitions. They argue this would support strategic mission needs and talent retention by allowing employees to preserve their earned personal leave.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter suggests expanding the list of acceptable uses for administrative leave to include time for an employee to relocate for a new appointment or assignment. They argue that this is already common practice and should be codified in the regulations to ensure consistency.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportOther
The commenter argues that the proposed regulation should be expanded to include administrative leave for employees relocating for new appointments or assignments. They contend that this is a common practice used to prevent pay gaps and is more frequent than the relocation of spouses.
Read comment →
