The commenter supports the proposed action but urges the OCC to go further by requiring full public disclosure of stablecoin issuer ownership, especially regarding foreign and politically connected interests. They also advocate for public reporting whenever customer funds are frozen and for heightened scrutiny of issuers with potential conflicts of interest.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it provides insufficient structural protection against foreign ownership and lack of transparency in banking. They call for stricter requirements, including public disclosure of owners, removal of confidential business plans from applications, and mandatory records for freezing funds.

The commenter supports the proposed action and requests additional requirements for the OCC, such as mandatory public disclosure of ownership for coin companies operating as uninsured banks. They also advocate for thorough reviews of ownership involving government officials and public notice/records when funds are frozen.

The commenter supports the proposed action but requests additional requirements for stablecoin issuers. They advocate for mandatory public disclosure of ownership, foreign investors, and interest distribution, as well as deep reviews for entities owned by elected officials or foreign governments.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, citing concerns over the lack of FDIC insurance, insufficient transparency regarding ownership and business plans, and potential conflicts of interest involving the current Administration. They also express significant concern regarding foreign influence due to a 49% minority ownership stake by a firm with ties to the United Arab Emirates.

The commenter supports the proposed action and urges the OCC to impose stricter transparency requirements on coin companies operating as uninsured banks. They specifically request that these companies publicly disclose their human owners, foreign investors, and interest earners to better police risks associated with foreign government ties.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it creates an enforcement carve-out for stablecoin issuers with "effective" AML/CFT programs, which they argue could lead to political favoritism and lack of oversight. They express concern over the OCC's independence and suggest requiring stablecoin issuers to publicly disclose their owners and investors to prevent political influence.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule (OCC-2026-0463), arguing that it lacks sufficient transparency regarding ownership and foreign investment in coin companies. They demand stricter oversight, public disclosure of owners, and more rigorous controls on stablecoin issuance to prevent political corruption and financial risk.

The commenter supports the proposed action but argues that the OCC should deny charters to entities tied to foreign governments or elected officials to prevent corruption. They advocate for stricter transparency requirements, public disclosure of owners, and mandatory reporting on the use of fund-freezing mechanisms.