National Wildlife Refuge System; Request for Information on Implementation of Drain Tile Setbacks

An individual commenter opposes the proposed drain tile setbacks, arguing that the regulations are "poorly wrote laws" that will negatively impact future generations' ability to enjoy waterfowl and hunting as a form of therapy and tradition.

David Pruett of the RiceLand Waterfowl Club supports the proposed action to prevent the draining of protected duck breeding grounds. He argues that preserving these areas is essential for maintaining waterfowl populations, which in turn supports the hunting heritage and the local economy.

The commenter supports maintaining the current rule regarding drain tile setbacks, arguing that it protects critical waterfowl habitat and conservation easements. They express concern that weakening these protections would harm waterfowl populations and hunting opportunities.

Andre, an individual commenter, supports the current regulations regarding drain tile setbacks. He argues that the regulations protect investments made by hunters and conservationists while providing landowners with clear, science-based guidance.

Ducks Unlimited supports maintaining the "No Impact" policy for drain tile setbacks to protect wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region. They argue that weakening these protections would cause irreversible damage to wildlife and water quality.

Joshua James, Chairman of Wallowa County Ducks Unlimited, urges the agency to maintain the "no impact" policy regarding drain tile setbacks. He argues that weakening the rule would have devastating impacts on prairie habitats and conservation efforts.