Citizen Petition from Soft Lights Foundation
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Soft Lights Foundation
- Posted
- Jan 2, 2026
- Comment period
- Jan 2, 2026 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Driver safety | Led light health effects |
|---|---|---|
Soft Lights Foundation AdvocacySupport The Soft Lights Foundation is submitting a petition and thousands of public comments urging the FDA and NHTSA to establi |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jan 26, 2026Comment from Richard CherrySupportOther
The commenter provides scientific evidence regarding the negative impacts of LED lighting on soil microbes, carbon cycling, and air quality. They support the petition's request to return to legacy street lighting to mitigate these environmental and health risks.
Read comment → - Jan 4, 2026Comment from Brooke CandrianSupportAdvocacyRead comment →
- Jan 3, 2026Comment from Anne UyedaSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed action by the Soft Lights Foundation, which seeks to ban LED lights. The commenter argues that LEDs are destructive to human health and the environment, disrupting sleep cycles and biological functions, and calls for a total ban on their production and installation.
Read comment →
