Citizen Petition from Soft Lights Foundation
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Soft Lights Foundation
- Posted
- Jan 2, 2026
- Comment period
- Jan 2, 2026 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Driver safety | Led light health effects |
|---|---|---|
Soft Lights Foundation AdvocacySupport The Soft Lights Foundation is submitting a petition and thousands of public comments urging the FDA and NHTSA to establi |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Mar 1, 2026Comment from Callie CumminsSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the Soft Lights Foundation's petition requesting that the FDA study and report on the public health and accessibility impacts of high-intensity LED vehicle headlights. They argue that current regulations ignore the physiological harm and glare caused by these lights, which disproportionately affect certain populations and create accessibility barriers.
Read comment → - Jan 4, 2026Comment from Albert KaufmanSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition and argues that the current testing procedures for vehicle lighting are flawed and easily manipulated by manufacturers. They advocate for revamping the tests to include movable rigs that simulate road imperfections and implementing a hard cap on low beam brightness.
Read comment →
