Citizen Petition from Tobias Gilk
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Tobias Gilk
- Posted
- Sep 4, 2025
- Comment period
- Sep 4, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 11, 2026Comment from Edward PipalskiSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 10, 2026Comment from Cassandra M NolteOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 10, 2026Comment from Julius JohnsonSupportIndividual
The commenter, an MRI technologist, supports the petition to require manufacturers to provide RF distribution maps. They argue that increased transparency regarding RF intensity is necessary to improve patient safety and help professionals optimize protocols to reduce the risk of RF-related burns.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Comment from Cynthia MadsenSupportIndividual
Tobias Gilk, a diagnostic imaging leader, supports the petition requiring MRI manufacturers to provide specific maps of radiofrequency intensity and spatial distribution. He argues that this information is critical for assessing risks to patients with implanted medical devices and for improving overall MRI safety and transparency.
Read comment → - Jun 4, 2026Comment from Cynthia Cameron ZenSupportIndividual
Tobias Gilk, a registered MRI technologist, supports the petition to improve MRI safety by requiring the documentation and indexing of incidents involving MRI and electronic devices. He argues that this transparency is necessary to prevent imaging centers from concealing incidents and to ensure public safety.
Read comment → - Sep 19, 2025Comment from Tobias GilkSupportIndividual
The commenter is responding to an anonymous comment regarding a citizen petition by Tobias Gilk. They argue in support of the petition by explaining that the proposed action is for identifying acute concerns rather than trend analysis and highlighting the limitations of the current FDA MAUDE database search tools.
Read comment → - Sep 17, 2025Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that the FDA advises against using MAUDE data for trend analysis due to its limitations as a passive surveillance system. They also state that relevant incidents can already be easily found using the existing FDA MAUDE database search tool.
Read comment → - Sep 10, 2025Comment from Cassandra BozeSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Sep 10, 2025Comment from Sebastian HutterSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to increase mandatory reporting on MRI safety events. They argue that increased reporting is a prudent measure to address growing pressures to scan more patients faster and to account for anecdotal increases in injuries.
Read comment → - Sep 9, 2025Comment from Heather BeaulieuSupportIndividualRead comment →
