Citizen Petition from David A. Kessler

The commenter supports the petition to remove the current GRAS standard to increase food transparency and manufacturer accountability. They cite personal health improvements from avoiding ultra-processed foods as a reason for their support.

The commenter argues that the government should stop providing assistance for foods that contribute to the obesity epidemic and corporate profits. They advocate for ending subsidies for unhealthy processed foods and stopping the use of chemicals in food production.

A physician supports the petition because processed foods with refined carbohydrates negatively impact the health of their patients and loved ones. The commenter argues that the FDA should provide stronger oversight and regulation of these ingredients to make healthy food choices more accessible.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a non-profit consumer advocacy organization, supports David A. Kessler's petition to limit the exposure of refined carbohydrates in industrial processing. They argue that processed refined carbohydrates should no longer be considered "generally recognized as safe" and that the food industry must demonstrate they meet safety standards.

Ric Bayly, an epidemiologist and writer for EatingInAmerica.co, supports the petition to revoke the "Generally Recognized As Safe" status of ultra-processed food (UPF) substances. He argues that peer-reviewed studies link UPF consumption to chronic diseases and that these products are engineered for hyperpalatability, posing a significant public health risk.

The North American Millers' Association (NAMA) opposes the petition to revoke the GRAS status of refined carbohydrates, arguing that such an action is not supported by scientific consensus and would remove safe, nutritious ingredients from the food supply. They contend that the petition misrepresents the science on "ultra-processed foods" and fails to distinguish between industrial and home use of these ingredients.

David A. Kessler shares a personal account of how a reliance on ultra-processed foods led to significant health issues for himself and his children. He argues that the current food environment prioritizes profit over public health and calls for stronger government regulation and oversight.