Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: DOCX Submission Requirements
PTO-P-2026-0331-0001Notice
Comments
13
Last activity Jun 26, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jun 27, 2026
Closed Jun 27, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-77%
-77% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: DOCX Submission Requirements
- Posted
- Apr 27, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 27, 2026 – Jun 27, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08101
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-77%
Net support
Oppose10Other3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -77% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
5
Individual
6
Advocacy
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Apr 27, 2026Deadline Jun 27, 2026
Jun 15Jun 22
Support0Oppose10Other3
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
0%
50%
50%
Business
0%
100%
0%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Docx filing reliability and fees |
|---|---|
CrossPond Law BusinessOppose Brian Schar, a registered patent attorney at CrossPond Law, argues that the USPTO's estimated time burden for DOCX filin | |
NEIFELD IP LAW, PLLC BusinessOppose Richard Neifeld of Neifeld IP Law, PLLC, opposes the USPTO's DOCX submission requirements, arguing that the "DOCX" forma |
CrossPond Law
BusinessOppose
Docx filing reliability and fees
NEIFELD IP LAW, PLLC
BusinessOppose
Docx filing reliability and fees
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
