Elimination of Time-in-Grade

IFPTE Local 777, a union representing federal employees, opposes the proposal to eliminate Time-in-Grade requirements because it replaces an objective standard with increased management discretion. They argue that removing this standard could undermine trust in the merit system and advocate for clear written promotion criteria and transparency if the change proceeds.

The commenter opposes the elimination of time-in-grade, arguing that it replaces objective fairness with manager discretion and risks favoritism. They request that OPM implement strict safeguards, audit agencies, and delay the rule's effective date to allow for the creation of objective review boards.

The commenter opposes the elimination of the Time-in-Grade (TIG) requirement, arguing that it lacks sufficient oversight, creates administrative burdens for HR, and risks inconsistent promotion standards. They propose a "Competency-Based Accelerated Promotion Waiver" (CBAPW) framework as a less burdensome alternative that maintains the 52-week baseline while allowing for specific, high-performing exceptions.