Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System
- Posted
- May 19, 2026
- Comment period
- May 19, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09944
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Rating system effectiveness | Risk assessment criteria |
|---|---|---|
Axos Bank BusinessSupport Axos Bank supports the proposed revisions to the CAMELS rating system, arguing that the changes are a necessary correcti | ||
The Bank of South Carolina BusinessSupport Eugene H. | ||
The Endangered Small Credit Union Defense AdvocacySupport Doug Wadsworth, representing the nonprofit advocacy organization Endangered Small Credit Union Defense (ESCUD), supports | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 22, 2026VERIBANC, Inc.OpposeBusiness
The commenter opposes the removal of factors related to management depth, succession, and responsiveness to regulatory recommendations from the rating system. They argue that these factors are essential for ensuring the safety and soundness of banks and that removing them would weaken the regulatory oversight process.
Read comment → - Jul 19, 2026Michael DirkSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Michael S Dirk, a former financial institution examiner, supports the proposed changes to the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System to sharpen the focus on risk measurements and financial condition. He argues for maintaining the "Special Consideration" for management ratings and suggests further refinements to ensure the framework balances financial condition with risk profile and management's causal influence.
Read comment → - Jul 7, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes several specific changes in the proposed Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System, arguing that removing "responsiveness to examiner recommendations" and "succession planning" as management factors could undermine bank safety and soundness. They also express concern over reducing the emphasis on specialty examination ratings, suggesting that these ratings serve as important leading indicators of risk.
Read comment →
