Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System
- Posted
- May 19, 2026
- Comment period
- May 19, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09944
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Rating system effectiveness | Risk assessment criteria |
|---|---|---|
Axos Bank BusinessSupport Axos Bank supports the proposed revisions to the CAMELS rating system, arguing that the changes are a necessary correcti | ||
The Bank of South Carolina BusinessSupport Eugene H. | ||
The Endangered Small Credit Union Defense AdvocacySupport Doug Wadsworth, representing the nonprofit advocacy organization Endangered Small Credit Union Defense (ESCUD), supports | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 16, 2026The Endangered Small Credit Union DefenseSupportAdvocacy
Doug Wadsworth, representing the nonprofit advocacy organization Endangered Small Credit Union Defense (ESCUD), supports the proposed revisions to the CAMELS rating system. He argues that the changes will provide practical relief to small credit unions by focusing on material financial risks and reducing the burden of non-material documentation and subjective management evaluations.
Read comment → - Jun 23, 2026Axos BankSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Axos Bank supports the proposed revisions to the CAMELS rating system, arguing that the changes are a necessary correction to ensure ratings are based on material financial risk rather than subjective process observations. The bank recommends specific operational requirements, such as sequencing the Management rating last and requiring documentation to prevent double-counting of risks, to make the proposal's objectives enforceable.
Read comment → - Jun 8, 2026Clark HervertOpposeBusiness
A small rural bank owner opposes the proposed rating system because it will increase compliance costs and administrative burdens for smaller institutions. They argue that the manual processes required to comply with the new standards will be disproportionately costly and request an exemption for banks with assets under $150 million.
Read comment → - May 19, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
