Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: National Science Foundation Proposal/Award Information Guidance on Financial Assistance
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: National Science Foundation Proposal/Award Information Guidance on Financial Assistance
- Posted
- Jun 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 24, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12725
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Administrative burden | International research collaboration | Political influence on science |
|---|---|---|---|
American Anthropological Association Trade associationSupport The American Anthropological Association supports the National Science Foundation's transition to the Guidance on Financ | · | · | |
Stand Up for Science Foundation AdvocacyOppose The Stand Up for Science Foundation opposes the proposed National Science Foundation Guidance on Financial Assistance (G |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 5 comments from the past week
5 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Kevin JohnsonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed NSF policy change, arguing that it prioritizes specific new programs and increased limits for certain proposal types at the expense of core basic research funding. They also criticize the document for being rushed and for failing to explain the TRUST framework.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Mary-Ann SchmutteSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Mary AndersonOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Sarah PallasOtherAcademic
A university professor shares a personal history of receiving NSF support throughout their career as a student, postdoc, and researcher. They argue that the NSF is essential to national scientific standing and should receive more funding rather than cuts.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12725 from Roy FilsonSupportIndividualRead comment →
