Masdar Clean Energy — Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (ADFEC)
BusinessSupport
Cyber-physical security alignment
NRC-2025-1303-0001
Comments
79
Last activity Jul 27, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
+9%
+9% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 55 of 79 comments
70%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
+9%
Net support
Support28Oppose23Other4Not yet analyzed24
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is +9% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
6
Individual
34
Trade association
1
Other
14
Not yet analyzed
24
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27
Support28Oppose23Other4
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
26%
62%
12%
Other
86%
14%
0%
Business
100%
0%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Cyber-physical security alignment |
|---|---|
Masdar Clean Energy — Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company (ADFEC) BusinessSupport Muhammad Ali Zeghum, Head of Security at Masdar Clean Energy, supports the NRC's shift toward a performance-based physic |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 27, 2026Beth ReedSupportIndividual
The commenter provides technical feedback and suggestions for DG-5088, specifically regarding regulatory citations, guidance alignment with DANU-ISG-2026-01, and performance objectives for prompt detection. They recommend correcting specific regulatory references and updating tables to include material attractiveness.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportOther
The commenter requests an update to 10 C.F.R 26.91 to allow the use of alcohol testing devices that have been approved by NHTSA but are not yet listed on the Conforming Products List (CPL). They argue that an official approval letter from NHTSA should suffice for licensees to use these devices and urge NHTSA to update the CPL in the Federal Register.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportOther
The commenter suggests revising the scope of licensee ammunition verification activities to clarify that technical compliance with manufacturer specifications is the manufacturer's responsibility. They argue that licensees lack the specialized testing capabilities for such certification and should instead focus on functional evaluations and inspections for defects.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →