Fisheries of the Northeastern United States: Omnibus Management Flexibility Amendment to New England Fishery Management Council Fishery Management Plans
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Fisheries of the Northeastern United States: Omnibus Management Flexibility Amendment to New England Fishery Management Council Fishery Management Plans
- Posted
- May 14, 2026
- Comment period
- May 14, 2026 – Jul 14, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09617
- CFR
- 50 CFR Part 648
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 11, 2026Richard SpottsOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed management flexibility amendment, arguing that it could weaken existing regulations and lead to less accountability and the prioritization of short-term profit over long-term sustainability. They urge NOAA to continue following the best science and the law to protect vulnerable fisheries.
Read comment → - Jun 19, 2026Victoria LopezOpposeIndividual
An individual is opposing the management plans because they believe fishing is inherently cruel and causes unnecessary pain to marine life. They argue that fish and crabs should be protected from fishing entirely rather than managed, citing the sentience of fish as a reason to end all fishing activities.
Read comment →
