Government ContextGovernment Context
ActivityRulesGrantsPress releasesHearingsBills
ViewsAgenciesTopicsOrganizationsCommitteesLegislators
PricingLog inCreate account

Table of contents

DetailsOverviewPosition mapExplorerRelated

NHTSA-2026-0728-0001
Comments
61
Last activity Jul 27, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-22%
-22% excluding campaigns
Document

Details

The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.

Topics
View on regulations.gov ↗
Analysis

Overview

What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.

Include campaigns
Analyzed 55 of 61 comments
90%· analysis in progress

Stance breakdown

-22%
Net support
Support18Oppose30Other7Not yet analyzed6
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -22% across organic comments.

Who commented

Breakdown by commenter type.

Business
6
Government
1
Individual
45
Advocacy
1
Trade association
1
Other
1
Not yet analyzed
6

Comments over time

Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.

Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27
Support18Oppose30Other7

Support × commenter type

How each type splits across stance.

Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
29%
60%
11%
Business
33%
33%
33%
Government
100%
0%
0%
Advocacy
0%
100%
0%
Trade association
100%
0%
0%
Other
100%
0%
0%

Issues raised

The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.

Manual override controls36
→
Emergency braking systems25
→
Vehicle safety18
→
Cybersecurity risks2
→
Passenger comfort1
→

Position map

Who stands where on each issue?

Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.

Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America)
Trade associationSupport
Vehicle safety
Texas Department of Transportation
GovernmentSupport
Vehicle safety
Comments

Explorer

Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.

Filter: