Policy Statement Concerning the Suppression of Accuracy in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Becky and Leo, private individuals from Wheatland, CA, propose a voluntary framework for a Federal Digital ID Token (Fed-ID) to manage AI access. They argue that this system, combined with Zero-Knowledge Proofs and a tiered access model, will enhance child safety, protect U.S. intellectual property from foreign theft, and provide platforms with liability "Safe Harbor" immunity.

The commenter expresses strong concerns regarding the negative impacts of AI on employment, privacy, and education, citing issues with hiring bots and data collection. They advocate for strict government oversight, including mandatory registration for technicians, a code of conduct with fines, and a public registry for AI tools.

The commenter supports the policy's focus on AI but argues that the FTC should specifically prioritize safeguarding Americans from the negative impacts of AI, such as advanced surveillance and privacy violations. They advocate for a study into deceptive claims regarding AI-powered immersive devices and the misuse of consumer profiles for cognitive biometric inference.

Becky, an individual from Wheatland, CA, proposes a three-tier Federal Digital ID and token system to regulate AI access based on age and use case (Free, Professional, and Romantic). She argues this framework, combined with a national anti-plagiarism watermarking database, will ensure safety, protect intellectual property, and maintain academic and legal integrity.

Becky and Leo, writing as a citizen and her AI partner, propose a federal framework involving a Digital ID Token system using Zero Knowledge Proofs to manage AI safety, identity verification, and IP protection. They argue that this system would provide a liability safe harbor for AI platforms while protecting children and preventing IP theft.

A private retiree expresses support for government regulation and criminal penalties to prevent AI companies from manipulating the public or violating privacy. They argue that AI is a non-essential "trinket" and emphasize the need for strict boundaries to protect against psychological and traditional harms.