Guidance: Policy Statement; Applicability of Drug and Alcohol Testing Program to Transportation Network Companies

Lyft, Inc. opposes the proposed policy, arguing that it fails to account for the unique operating model of transportation network companies (TNCs) and would hinder transit agencies' ability to provide cost-effective, flexible mobility options. The company advocates for a policy that recognizes their existing safety protocols and software-based business model rather than requiring a dedicated fleet-like drug and alcohol testing program.

The Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) supports the FTA's proposed guidance to require drug and alcohol testing for transportation network company (TNC) operators who contract with transit agencies. They argue that this is a necessary safety measure, aligns with existing law, and prevents transit agencies from choosing TNCs over traditional transit services based on lower compliance costs.

Uber Technologies, Inc. opposes the FTA's proposed policy to revise the taxicab exception for drug and alcohol testing, arguing it exceeds statutory authority and lacks legal justification. The company contends that the proposal will impose unnecessary financial and operational burdens, create driver shortages, and ultimately reduce transportation access for underserved communities.

The Research Triangle Foundation of North Carolina opposes the proposal because it would force changes to their "RTP Connect" program, which relies on Lyft to provide essential first- and last-mile transit connections. They argue that TNCs already maintain rigorous safety standards and that the proposed requirements would result in more costly, less reliable, and less frequent transportation options for riders.

The commenter argues that the proposed policy would make it difficult and costly for transit agencies to provide paratransit services through private contractors. They suggest that private companies would likely stop partnering with transit agencies because the new requirements would not be cost-effective.

The commenter opposes the proposed drug and alcohol testing requirements for transportation network companies because they believe it will lead to the termination of the "Ride Flex" service. They argue that losing this subsidized service would cause significant personal financial burdens, travel delays, and reduced access to essential community activities.

Shirley Dorris, a blind individual who relies on rideshare services for independence, expresses concern about the potential unintended consequences of new drug and alcohol testing requirements. She argues that if these regulations lead to fewer drivers or higher costs, it could jeopardize essential transportation programs for people with disabilities.