Citizen Petition from Children’s Health Defense
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Children’s Health Defense
- Posted
- Dec 9, 2025
- Comment period
- Dec 9, 2025 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Failure to follow regulatory procedures | Fda rule compliance | Gene therapy safety and integration | Remove harmful products from market | Revoke vaccine licenses |
|---|
8 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Mar 17, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the FDA conducting a careful review of the licensure status of the Comirnaty and Spikevax vaccines. They request a transparent response to a citizen petition, asking the agency to clarify the evidentiary basis for licensure and address ongoing safety concerns.
Read comment → - Mar 16, 2026Comment from Benedetti, EricOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 15, 2026Comment from Napierala, MichaelSupportIndividual
The commenter urges the government to immediately pull COVID-19 vaccines from the market, arguing that they are unsafe and were approved without proper scrutiny. They accuse pharmaceutical companies of prioritizing profits over public safety and call for a transparent review of the evidence regarding these products.
Read comment → - Mar 15, 2026Comment from F, MSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 15, 2026Comment from LeGault, WendySupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the petition by arguing that individuals should have the right to choose what they put in their bodies without government interference. They express a desire for manufacturer and medical liability regarding the risks and ingredients of "protections" (vaccines).
Read comment → - Mar 14, 2026Comment from Paden, JeromeSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that pharmaceutical companies are engaging in criminal actions by secretly inoculating the public with toxic and technologically advanced substances. They demand an immediate suspension of all vaccine production until open-source reviews are conducted and the results are made public.
Read comment → - Mar 13, 2026Comment from mitteldorf, joshSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that the mRNA COVID vaccines lack sufficient long-term, placebo-controlled safety data and that the FDA has failed to require such studies. They suggest that existing data indicates a much higher frequency of severe adverse reactions compared to older vaccine technologies.
Read comment → - Mar 13, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues that the FDA failed to meet its own evidentiary standards when transitioning mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Emergency Use Authorization to full Biologics License Application approval. They request that the FDA conduct a transparent review of the licensure process, require updated risk-benefit analyses for current conditions, and enforce post-market study commitments.
Read comment → - Mar 13, 2026Comment from Fortmuller, DagmarSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 13, 2026Comment from LoGiudice, SuzanneSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to revoke the licenses for the Comirnaty and Spikevax COVID-19 vaccines. They argue that the manufacturers failed to meet standard Biologics License Application requirements and cite high numbers of adverse events reported in VAERS as a reason for the revocation.
Read comment →