Citizen Petition from Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al.
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al.
- Posted
- Sep 25, 2024
- Comment period
- Sep 25, 2024 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Contains animals labeling | Ingredient transparency |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 18, 2025Comment from Julie CSupportIndividual
An individual consumer supports the proposed rule to improve food labeling regarding animal-derived ingredients. They argue that clearer disclosures are necessary for people with life-threatening allergies, health concerns, or specific ethical and religious beliefs.
Read comment → - May 9, 2025Comment from Amy JohannesenSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 27, 2025Comment from Claire BushSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that current FDA labeling requirements are insufficient because they do not clearly identify animal-derived ingredients. They state that improved labeling is necessary for consumers with life-threatening allergies, health concerns, or specific ethical and religious beliefs.
Read comment → - Apr 22, 2025Comment from Naomi KlassSupportIndividual
An individual is requesting that the FDA update labeling requirements to clearly identify animal-derived ingredients. They argue that this change is necessary for people with life-threatening allergies, specific health concerns, or religious and ethical beliefs.
Read comment → - Mar 18, 2025Comment from Harper CookSupportAdvocacyRead comment →
- Dec 16, 2024Comment from Stacy LoebSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition by highlighting the importance of transparency regarding animal ingredients in products. They argue that this information is crucial for consumers with life-threatening allergies, such as alpha-gal syndrome, as well as for those with religious or personal beliefs.
Read comment → - Dec 1, 2024Comment from Crystal MarshallSupportIndividual
An individual is urging the agency to require a "contains animals" disclosure on food labels. They argue this is necessary to protect consumers with life-threatening allergies, health concerns, or specific ethical and religious beliefs.
Read comment → - Nov 26, 2024Comment from Stacey GovitoSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that current FDA labeling requirements are insufficient because they do not clearly identify animal-derived ingredients. They state that clearer labeling is necessary for consumers with life-threatening allergies, health concerns, or specific ethical and religious beliefs.
Read comment → - Nov 22, 2024Comment from Kellen DunnSupportIndividual
The commenter is urging the FDA to require clear labeling on all products indicating the presence of animal-derived ingredients. They argue that such transparency is necessary for consumers with life-threatening allergies, health concerns, or specific ethical and religious beliefs.
Read comment → - Nov 22, 2024Comment from Diana KekuleSupportIndividual
An individual, acting on behalf of themselves and their family, supports the Animal Legal Defense Fund's petition. They argue that the FDA should require food companies to disclose all animal-derived ingredients and the specific species they come from to accommodate ethical, religious, and health reasons.
Read comment →
