Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Improving Customer Service and Protecting Consumers through Onshoring
- Posted
- Apr 23, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 23, 2026 – Jun 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07960
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Issues are identified as comment analysis progresses — nothing tagged on this document yet.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Nov 7, 2002TSI Telecommunication Services Inc.Analysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Nov 5, 2002Wells Fargo & CompanyAnalysis pending📎 AttachmentRead comment →
- Nov 14, 2002Carolynn ReeseOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 14, 2002Janet IvasOpposeIndividual
Janet Ivas, a private citizen, opposes the proposal because she believes it would weaken Indiana's Telephone Privacy law protections. She argues that the proposal favors corporations over individual privacy and expresses concern over the increase in telemarketing interruptions.
Read comment → - Nov 14, 2002Barbara J. ZazasSupportIndividual
An individual resident of Indiana expresses strong support for the proposed action by requesting that the federal government do not override existing state laws that limit telemarketing calls. The commenter highlights how these state protections have improved their quality of life and the safety of their neighbors.
Read comment → - Nov 14, 2002William H KingSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 14, 2002Y. Glenn JamesOpposeIndividual
An individual resident of Indiana opposes the proposed federal no-call list law, arguing that it will weaken and dilute existing state laws that are already effectively managing unsolicited calls and protecting their privacy. The commenter expresses concern that the federal measure will lead to an increase in unwanted calls and stress.
Read comment → - Nov 14, 2002Amy ThompsonOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 14, 2002Al BrumleyOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Nov 14, 2002Allen/Karen HeltzelOpposeIndividualRead comment →
