Environmental Assessments; Availability, etc.: SpaceX Starship Reentry Contingency Operations in the Pacific Ocean and Additional Starship Landing Trajectory
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Environmental Assessments; Availability, etc.: SpaceX Starship Reentry Contingency Operations in the Pacific Ocean and Additional Starship Landing Trajectory
- Posted
- Jul 27, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 27, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-15089
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 4 comments from the past week
4 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 27, 2026Emily AlpertOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that the public comment period is too short and that the assessment fails to adequately analyze the impacts on commercial air traffic and public safety. They specifically highlight concerns regarding rocket anomalies over land and the compatibility of Starship operations with nearby industrial developments like LNG facilities and refineries.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Madeline McDowellOpposeIndividual
A homeowner in Vandenberg Village opposes the proposed actions due to concerns over structural damage to homes from SpaceX launches. The commenter argues that SpaceX should be held financially responsible for repairs and should comply with state environmental protection laws.
Read comment →