Draft Environmental Assessment - English and Spanish
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Draft Environmental Assessment - English and Spanish
- Posted
- Jul 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 14, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 2 comments from the past week
2 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 24, 2026DANIELE BOLELLIOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026William ThomasSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the Draft Tiered EA for SpaceX Boca Chica, arguing that the Starship second stage has minimal environmental impact compared to traditional aircraft. They suggest treating the vehicle as a steel aircraft and integrating it into the air traffic control system.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Gary RowlandOpposeIndividual
A concerned resident and taxpayer of Port Isabel opposes the draft Tiered Environmental Assessment for SpaceX's Starship reentries. The commenter argues that the assessment period is too short, underestimates the impact on commercial air traffic, and fails to adequately evaluate the safety consequences of land-based malfunctions or compatibility with local industrial developments.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Charles LepkowskyOpposeIndividual
An individual commenter opposes the approval of Starship launches from Vandenberg, citing concerns over noise and vibration levels. They argue that the Starship generates significantly more sound and vibration than the Falcon 9, which could cause devastating damage to local homes.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Mary Elizabeth HollmannOpposeIndividual
A concerned resident of Brownsville opposes the proposed expansion of Starship reentry areas, citing concerns over insufficient public participation, disruptions to commercial air traffic, and lack of analysis regarding rocket anomalies over land. The commenter also questions the compatibility of the project with local industrial developments and safety implications regarding a proposed LNG facility.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the current Draft Environmental Assessment for SpaceX's Starship reentries, arguing that it fails to adequately address commercial aviation impacts, overland anomaly risks, and the cumulative environmental and safety burdens on the Boca Chica community. They request an extension of the comment period, public hearings, and a revised assessment that includes a full analysis of these risks and adjacent industrial developments.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 17, 2026Teresa BorstelmannOpposeIndividualRead comment →
