Airworthiness Directives: General Electric Company Engines
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Airworthiness Directives: General Electric Company Engines
- Posted
- Jun 3, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 3, 2026 – Jul 21, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11085
- CFR
- 14 CFR Part 39
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Eligibility of repaired parts |
|---|---|
United Airlines BusinessSupport United Airlines Engineering supports the proposed rule but requests clarification on the eligibility of main fuel pumps |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 20, 2026United AirlinesSupportBusiness
United Airlines Engineering supports the proposed rule but requests clarification on the eligibility of main fuel pumps for installation. They specifically ask if pumps that complied with GE Service Bulletins but were not overhauled during the same shop visit should be considered eligible.
Read comment → - Jul 19, 2026All Nippon Airways (ANA)SupportBusiness
ANA is requesting specific modifications and clarifications to the proposed Airworthiness Directive regarding General Electric Company engines. They argue that the AD should target the MFP level specifically for units with overhaul histories, clarify the definition of "no prior service history," and remove unnecessary overhaul requirements for eligible parts.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Alaska AirlinesSupportBusiness
Alaska Airlines requests clarifying language in the Airworthiness Directive to exempt Main Fuel Pumps (MFPs) that have never undergone a shop visit or repair from the required removal. They argue that because the issue stems from incorrect torque measurements during repair/reassembly, new production pumps without service history are not affected.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026UPSSupportBusiness
UPS Airline is requesting specific wording changes to the Airworthiness Directive to clarify which main fuel pumps are eligible for installation. They argue that the current language is too restrictive regarding "prior service history" and "overhaul" requirements, and they propose more precise language based on repair history and specific service bulletins.
Read comment → - Jun 22, 2026Lufthansa Technik AGSupportBusiness
Lufthansa Technik AG requests that the FAA expand the scope of the proposed Airworthiness Directive to include repaired Main Fuel Pumps (MFPs) that have undergone specific screw replacements. They argue that because these repairs are traceable via specific Service Bulletins, repaired units should be considered eligible for installation alongside new and overhauled units.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2026Hirotaka TakashimaOtherOther
The commenter is seeking clarification on a discrepancy between the proposed Airworthiness Directive's definition of "part eligible for installation" and the service criteria provided by Woodward, Inc. regarding thrust bearing screws. They are asking for confirmation on which method of determination will take precedence once the AD becomes effective.
Read comment →
