Airworthiness Directives: Pratt and Whitney Division Engines
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Airworthiness Directives: Pratt and Whitney Division Engines
- Posted
- May 26, 2026
- Comment period
- May 26, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10408
- CFR
- 14 CFR Part 39
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Sensor replacement requirements | Years in service definition |
|---|---|---|
Delta Air Lines BusinessSupport Delta Air Lines, Inc. | · | |
Pratt & Whitney, an RTX Business BusinessSupport Pratt & Whitney (RTX Corporation) supports the proposed Airworthiness Directive but requests specific technical clarific | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 9, 2026Delta Air LinesSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Delta Air Lines, Inc. submitted comments on the proposed airworthiness directive for Pratt & Whitney Division engines. The company requests specific modifications to the applicability, definitions, and required actions to better align the rule with existing service bulletins and operational tracking methods.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026European Air Transport Leipzig GmbHSupportOther
The commenter requests that the "Years In Service" counter for Electronic Engine Controllers (EECs) be differentiated based on whether the units are stored in a controlled environment or are in active operation. They argue that epoxy deterioration is technically different for stored units compared to those installed and operated on aircraft.
Read comment →
