Proposed Approval of the Ohio Air Nuisance Rule Removal
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Proposed Approval of the Ohio Air Nuisance Rule Removal
- Posted
- May 28, 2026
- Comment period
- May 28, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-10643
- CFR
- 40 CFR Part 52
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by OMA, OCTC, Ohio Chamber on the Proposed Approval of the Ohio Air Nuisance Rule RemovalSupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The Ohio Chamber of Commerce, the Ohio Chemistry Technology Council, and The Ohio Manufacturers’ Association support the Ohio EPA's proposal to remove the Air Nuisance Rule (ANR) from Ohio's State Implementation Plan. They argue that the ANR is an "end-result" provision unrelated to National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and that its removal is consistent with EPA's long-standing practice and other states' actions.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Miles HlivkoOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues against the removal of the Ohio Air Nuisance Rule from the State Implementation Plan, citing concerns over the loss of citizen enforcement rights and the removal of protections against local pollutants like odors and dust. They contend that removing the rule violates anti-backsliding principles and compromises public health and property values.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Elaina ValzaniaOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Sarah SilverOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Claire VecchioOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Andrea BarrettOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Mark GearyOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Andrea IronsOpposeIndividual
A resident of Ohio opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from the State Implementation Plan. The commenter argues that the rule is a vital mechanism for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by Christine TindallOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment → - Jun 26, 2026Comment submitted by John E DunkumOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the removal of the Air Nuisance Rule from Ohio's federal Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan (SIP). They argue that the rule is a critical tool for holding polluters accountable and protecting public health, and they urge the EPA to deny the state's request to remove it.
Read comment →