Interim PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance; Notice of Availability for Public Comment
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Interim PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance; Notice of Availability for Public Comment
Federal Register for Tuesday, April 28, 2026 (91 FR 22815) [FRL-10169.1-01-OLEM]
- Posted
- Apr 28, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 28, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08174
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Drinking water treatment residuals | Pfas destruction technologies | Underground injection disposal |
|---|
7 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Waste Management (WM)SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
WM, a leading environmental services provider, supports the EPA's interim guidance on PFAS destruction and disposal, specifically noting the importance of modern landfills as a disposal option. The company offers to collaborate on research regarding fate and transport, emissions testing, solidification and stabilization, and the development of a practical decision framework for landfill disposal.
Read comment → - Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Ingevity CorporationSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Ingevity Corporation, a manufacturer of specialty materials and technologies, supports the EPA's Interim Guidance on the destruction and disposal of PFAS. The company specifically advocates for the inclusion of both powdered and granular activated carbon as water treatment options and supports the continued use of permitted landfills for long-term PFAS disposal.
Read comment → - Jun 27, 2026Comment submitted by OnterrisSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Onterris (formerly Montrose Environmental Group), an environmental solutions provider, supports the proposed guidance but argues that it misrepresents the capabilities of regenerable ion exchange (RIEX) technology. They request that the EPA acknowledge RIEX as a demonstrated, full-scale, and cost-effective waste-minimization technology for PFAS removal, specifically requesting its inclusion as a Best Available Technology (BAT).
Read comment → - Jun 26, 2026Comment submitted by Water Quality Association (WQA)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Water Quality Association (WQA), a non-profit representing the water treatment industry, supports the EPA's efforts to provide PFAS destruction and disposal guidance but urges the agency to distinguish between industrial waste and small-scale drinking water treatment residuals. They argue that the guidance should use a risk-based framework to ensure that technologies used by consumers to protect public health are not unfairly burdened by regulations intended for primary PFAS source materials.
Read comment →