Interim PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance; Notice of Availability for Public Comment
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Interim PFAS Destruction and Disposal Guidance; Notice of Availability for Public Comment
Federal Register for Tuesday, April 28, 2026 (91 FR 22815) [FRL-10169.1-01-OLEM]
- Posted
- Apr 28, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 28, 2026 – Jun 30, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08174
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Drinking water treatment residuals | Pfas destruction technologies | Underground injection disposal |
|---|
7 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 29, 2026Comment submitted by Arcwood Environmental, LLCSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Arcwood Environmental, LLC, a domestic provider of PFAS management and disposal solutions, supports the EPA's 2026 Interim Guidance on PFAS destruction and disposal. The company argues that recent commercial-scale testing demonstrates that hazardous waste incineration is an effective destruction method and advocates for a site-specific performance-based approach rather than a universal minimum temperature requirement.
Read comment → - Jun 26, 2026Comment submitted by New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupportGovernment📎 Attachment
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) supports the EPA's efforts to update the interim guidance on PFAS destruction and disposal, commending the inclusion of new science and analytical methods. However, the NJDEP urges the EPA to address specific data gaps, such as the need for a formal waste classification system, clearer performance criteria for destruction technologies, and more robust protections for vulnerable communities.
Read comment → - Jun 12, 2026Comment submitted by PacTec, Inc.SupportBusiness
PacTec, Inc., a manufacturer of flexible packaging systems, supports the EPA's recognition of interim storage for PFAS waste but argues that the guidance lacks specific recommendations on suitable container systems. The company recommends that the EPA include engineered flexible bulk containment systems as a viable technology for interim storage due to their scalability, safety, and logistical benefits.
Read comment →
