EEOC Strategic Plan FY2026-2030

Justice for Migrant Women opposes the proposed EEOC Strategic Plan, arguing that it focuses on political priorities rather than the most significant employment discrimination targets. They request the removal of references to the National Enforcement Plan, the inclusion of language regarding sexual orientation and gender identity protections, and a greater focus on outreach to vulnerable workers and underserved communities.

The Legal Defense Fund opposes the EEOC's Draft Strategic Plan for 2026-2030, arguing that it deprioritizes claims by Black workers and underserved communities in favor of a divisive political agenda. They request that the EEOC rescind the National Enforcement Plan, restore its focus on vulnerable workers, and extend the public comment period.

The National Women's Law Center, joined by several other advocacy organizations, opposes the EEOC's Draft Strategic Plan 2026-2030. They argue that the plan provides an inadequate comment period, incorporates partisan enforcement priorities, removes protections for LGBTQI+ workers, and eliminates specific outreach to vulnerable and underserved communities.

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) opposes the draft Strategic Plan because it sets unrealistic performance metrics and targets while ignoring a severe staffing crisis and budget cuts. They argue that the plan fails to prioritize hiring, retention, and adequate resources for investigators, and they call for the inclusion of specific stakeholders and a more realistic approach to workload management.

The National Women’s Law Center is requesting an extension of the public comment period for the EEOC Strategic Plan FY2026-2030. They argue that the current 18-day window is insufficient for thorough review, especially given the July 4th holiday, and request a minimum of 30 days.