Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project
- Posted
- Jun 17, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 17, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12145
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 7, 2026Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001OpposeOther
The commenter opposes the proposed amendment to include NH-IV broadband levels in the Accelerated Compensation for Developmental Positions (ACDP) program. They argue that NH-IV represents senior leadership and expert-level roles rather than the entry-level or developmental positions the program is intended to support.
Read comment → - Jul 7, 2026Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001OtherIndividual
The commenter points out inconsistencies and lack of clarity in the "Out-of-Cycle Within-Broadband Pay Increase" section of the proposal. They request that the document clearly define the specific mechanisms (such as CCAS or reassignment) through which internal within-band pay increases may occur.
Read comment → - Jul 7, 2026Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001OpposeOther
The commenter opposes the integration of NH-IV broadband levels into the Accelerated Compensation for Developmental Positions (ACDP) authority. They argue that these are senior roles that should be rewarded via Out-of-Cycle Within-Broadband Pay Increases instead of developmental pay structures, which they believe should be reserved for early-career talent.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001OtherIndividual
The commenter identifies internal inconsistencies in the proposed language regarding within-broadband pay increases. They argue that the second sentence unnecessarily narrows the scope of the first sentence and request clarification to ensure the provision reflects the intended flexibility.
Read comment → - Jun 18, 2026Comment on DOD-2026-OS-1321-0001SupportIndividual
The commenter, a civilian supervisor in the Department of Defense, supports the proposed rule amendments to the Civilian Acquisition Workforce Personnel Demonstration Project (AcqDemo). They argue that the current system fails to adequately compensate for increased responsibility and that the proposed out-of-cycle pay increases are necessary to retain high-performing personnel and ensure military readiness.
Read comment →
