2026-11012
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- 2026-11012
- Posted
- Jun 2, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 2, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 4 comments from the past week
4 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 17, 2026Rural AIDS Action NetworkSupportAdvocacy
The Executive Director of a non-profit harm reduction organization supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but requests specific improvements. They advocate for the inclusion of a broader range of services (like drug checking and safer smoking supplies), the protection of program confidentiality, and the inclusion of non-traditional programs in the survey.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Jess MahmoudOpposeAdvocacy
The commenter, a coordinator for a mobile harm reduction unit and mutual aid collective, opposes the proposed survey format because it provides insufficient time for data collection and lacks accessibility. They advocate for a digital and mail-in option to ensure a broader range of voices can participate.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment from HNVSupportAdvocacy
The commenter, representing a community-based nonprofit, supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but argues that it must be expanded to include a broader range of evidence-based harm reduction services and specific community barriers. They emphasize that the survey should capture the full scope of wraparound services provided by SSPs and be designed with input from those who operate and use these programs.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Andrew KnoxSupportIndividual📎 Attachment
Andrew Knox, a harm reduction program manager with the New Mexico Department of Health, supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs. He recommends making the survey more inclusive of diverse services, prioritizing participant confidentiality, and ensuring the voices of people with lived experience are included in the planning and leadership.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter, who has lived experience with drug use and syringe services programs (SSPs), opposes the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs due to privacy and surveillance concerns. They argue that the data collected could be weaponized against participants and programs, and they call for the CDC to prioritize privacy protections, minimize data collection, and involve people with lived experience in the survey's design.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Gina DahlemSupportIndividual
A family nurse practitioner with over 20 years of experience in overdose prevention and harm reduction supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but argues it needs more specificity. The commenter recommends that the CDC better distinguish between different types of programs, separate naloxone metrics, differentiate between direct services and referrals, and include more comprehensive harm reduction practices like drug checking and peer support.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, who identifies as a Person Who Uses Drugs with experience in harm reduction, supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but argues for more specific and comprehensive data collection. They request that the CDC distinguish between different types of programs, measure a wider range of modern harm reduction services, and track the actual power held by people with lived experience in program governance.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A volunteer at a small syringe exchange program opposes the proposed revisions to the National Survey of Syringe Exchanges. The commenter expresses concerns regarding the survey's length, the lack of differentiation between types of programs, and the potential for breaches of confidentiality and law enforcement interference.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Todd HSupportIndividual
Todd, a volunteer in harm reduction services and a personal experience with drug use, supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but urges the CDC to improve the survey's methodology. He suggests defining onsite services more clearly to distinguish them from outreach and emphasizes the need to protect program confidentiality from law enforcement.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, a harm reduction practitioner with over 25 years of experience, supports the proposed revision of the National Survey of Syringe Services Programs but argues for specific improvements. They advocate for better distinction between service delivery models, stronger privacy protections for programs, a more accurate definition of "community opposition," and a broader measurement of the full range of harm reduction services provided.
Read comment →
