Request for Information and Interest: Commercial Leasing for Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Offshore the Commonwealth of Virginia
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Request for Information and Interest: Commercial Leasing for Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Offshore the Commonwealth of Virginia
- Posted
- Jun 23, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 23, 2026 – Aug 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12600
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Offshore mining impacts | Deep sea mining environmental impact | Fisheries and economic impact | Environmental protection | Public engagement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission (A-NPDC) GovernmentOppose The Accomack-Northampton Planning District Commission (A-NPDC) opposes seabed mineral exploration and mining due to pote | · | · | |||
Carolina Ocean Alliance AdvocacyOppose The Carolina Ocean Alliance, along with several other environmental and coastal organizations, opposes the proposed leas | · | · | · | ||
Clean Ocean Action AdvocacyOppose Clean Ocean Action, an environmental advocacy organization, opposes the proposed leasing program for offshore mineral ex | · | · | |||
Fisheries Survival Fund AdvocacyOppose The Fisheries Survival Fund, represented by legal counsel, opposes the proposed mineral mining lease area offshore Virgi | · | · | |||
National Ocean Industries Association Trade associationSupport The National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA) supports the federal action to pursue commercial leasing for offshore m | · | · | · | · | · |
New England Fishermen's Stewardship Association AdvocacyOppose The New England Fisherman's Stewardship Association (NEFSA) opposes the proposed mineral mining lease areas offshore Vir | · | · | |||
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. BusinessSupport Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. | · | · | |||
Plus Nature LLC AdvocacyOppose +Nature argues that the proposed Virginia offshore mineral leasing should not proceed until a framework of "Principles f | · | · | · | · | · |
Shellfish Growers of Virginia Trade associationOppose The Shellfish Growers of Virginia, a trade association representing the state's shellfish aquaculture industry, opposes | · | · | |||
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (SCCCL) AdvocacyOppose The South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (CCL) opposes the proposed commercial mineral leasing offshore Virginia, | · | · | · | ||
The Nature Conservancy AdvocacyOppose The Nature Conservancy expresses significant concerns regarding the potential for mineral extraction off the coast of Vi | · | · | |||
Virginia Maritime Association Trade associationSupport The Virginia Maritime Association (VMA), representing nearly 400 port-related businesses, supports the responsible devel | · | · | · | · | |
Virginia Spaceport Authority GovernmentOppose The Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority (VSA) opposes the proposed commercial leasing of hard mineral resources o | · | · | · | · | |
Wetstone US Ventures, Inc. BusinessSupport Wetstone US Ventures, Inc. | · | · | · | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 9 comments from the past week
9 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 23, 2026Clean Ocean ActionOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Clean Ocean Action, an environmental advocacy organization, opposes the proposed leasing program for offshore mineral extraction off the coast of Virginia. They argue that mining would cause significant environmental harm to endangered species and habitats, conflict with existing maritime industries, and that less damaging alternatives for mineral sourcing exist.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Fugro USA, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Fugro USA, Inc. supports the proposed action and recommends that BOEM conduct a comprehensive inventory of existing datasets and perform targeted seafloor and subsurface mapping to fill data gaps. They argue that high-resolution mapping is essential for de-risking exploration, ensuring environmentally responsible development, and maximizing lease revenues for the U.S. Treasury.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Protect Our Coast LINY Inc.OpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Christina Kramer, President of Protect Our Coast Long Island NY, opposes the proposed commercial leasing for minerals offshore Virginia. The organization argues that the process lacks a comprehensive programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and warns of severe environmental risks, cumulative regional impacts, and a failure to consider terrestrial mining alternatives.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Creation Justice MinistriesOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Creation Justice Ministries, an organization representing various Christian denominations, opposes the proposal to allow seabed mining off the coast of Virginia. They argue that mining poses significant risks to marine ecosystems, endangered species, and coastal communities, and call for the protection of the seabed as a matter of moral and environmental responsibility.
Read comment → - Jul 20, 2026Plastic Ocean Project, IncOpposeBusiness
The commenter opposes the proposed commercial leasing for offshore minerals, arguing that it threatens ocean habitats and national security. They advocate for a shift toward circularity and mining landfills for mineral recovery instead of new offshore extraction.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026ECOncreteOtherBusiness📎 Attachment
ECOncrete Biome Inc. submits comments regarding the Request for Information on offshore mineral leasing in Virginia. The company states it does not take a position on whether the leasing should proceed but recommends specific environmental safeguards, nature-inclusive materials, and early coordination with state and local agencies if the leasing occurs.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc.SupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. supports the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's (BOEM) Request for Information regarding a potential mineral lease sale offshore Virginia. The company argues that developing domestic heavy mineral sands (HMS) will strengthen national security and supply chains using established dredging technologies.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)OtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Rebecca Loomis, a Staff Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), submitted a list of supporting documents and citations. The submission provides research and data regarding marine habitats, indigenous history, and environmental impacts related to the proposed action.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)OtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Rebecca Loomis, a Staff Attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), submitted a list of supporting documents and citations. The submission provides research and data regarding indigenous rights, marine ecology, and commercial fishing impacts to inform the agency's consideration of the proposed action.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council)OtherAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Rebecca Loomis of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) submitted a list of supporting documents and citations related to the proposed action. The submission provides research and data on indigenous rights, marine ecology, and the impacts of dredging and mining to inform the decision-making process.
Read comment →
