Management of BLM WSAs Manual 6330 91 FR 35997 6.15.26

The commenter, writing as a descendant of a former BLM employee, opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6330 that would weaken protections for wilderness study areas. They argue that the current standards should be preserved to prevent development and preserve the integrity of public lands as intended by the Wilderness Act.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.

The commenter opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6330 that would weaken protections for wilderness areas. They argue that motorized use and logging destroy wilderness character and urge the BLM to preserve existing standards.

The commenter opposes any revisions to BLM Manual 6330 that would weaken protections for wilderness areas. They argue that allowing roads, motorized use, or logging would permanently destroy wilderness character and urge the BLM to preserve existing standards.

The commenter, writing as a private citizen, opposes the BLM's review of wilderness policies and urges the agency to maintain current policies. They argue that preserving wilderness character is essential for recreation, environmental protection, and local economic benefits, and request that any future changes prioritize protection from industrial development.